<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="/astrobytes/rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:site="https://anna-rosen.com/ns/provenance"><channel><title>Astrobytes — Anna Rosen</title><description>Astronomy papers, explained. What was measured, the mechanism behind the result, and what it does not show.</description><link>https://anna-rosen.com/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://anna-rosen.com/astrobytes/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When more data makes you more certain of the wrong answer</title><link>https://anna-rosen.com/astrobytes/confidently-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://anna-rosen.com/astrobytes/confidently-wrong/</guid><description>Unresolved binaries bias the measured slope of the stellar initial mass function by a fixed amount. Statistical error shrinks with sample size; that bias does not.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><site:authorship>ai-drafted</site:authorship><site:reviewedBy>Anna Rosen</site:reviewedBy><category>initial mass function</category><category>binaries</category><category>statistical inference</category><category>star clusters</category></item></channel></rss>